The Taproom
MMP › Mithril in Middle-Earth › The Prancing Pony › The Taproom
- This topic has 6,719 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by Barliman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 1, 2010 at 7:20 am #11700
Which brings us back to the old chestnut of Azog being the father of Bolg, which would be difficult without the, er, participation of an Orc female. And as I’ve said before (the Tree is right in observing that this ground has all been covered in earlier discussions), JRRT states in his assorted jottings that Orcs procreated in the same way as all the other ‘peoples’ of Middle-earth. There was no Biblical fashioning from clay, as the movie version would have us believe.
September 1, 2010 at 7:31 am #11701this debate seems to be of some interest as it comes up from dark corners again and again.
i think we all have to accept, that tolkien was never as precise as some wish and this is exactly, what makes his world so interesting and fascinating. tolkien wrote his stories as if true and long forgotten history was told and no one ever knows what exactly happened. that is also the case for the reproduction of orcs. to bring in much more confusion, some passages of his texts are contradictory, some just confusing, e.g. the mentioning of more than just orcs, like goblins hobgoblins and so on. nobody really knows what they were and nobody will really know where they come from.
what could be stated as relatively sure is, that orcs must have ‘liked’ females of other races as they took them as prisoners (at least in the first age) but that might be because they are beautifull and orcs hate all beauty.
not to know everything is what makes things magical and fascinating. think of movies, where not everything is explained in full detail, it makes them more fascinating and marvellous than in the (typical American style) movies, where everything is explained like in soap operas. what did you like more: Ridley Scotts Alien movie or a soap of any kind?? why was the x-files series so powerfull? because the audience did nor get more than very few hints. when was the mystic over? when more and more was explained- the series became boring.
think of all the mysterious scenes in lord of the rings explained?? Just think of a complete explanation of the paths of the dead. horrible!!!!!! dreadfull!!!!!
the whole literature of tolkien is based on private imagination. let it be.September 1, 2010 at 7:42 am #11702…that’s the point of all fantasy genres…. private imagination and mystic thoughts… and yes let it be… this is the point of freedom….
September 1, 2010 at 5:45 pm #11703*cough*
Goblins are orcs. Goblin is the Hobbit word for Orc.
Tolkien also made a minor boo-boo with Hobgoblins. He assumed Hobgoblin meant “big” Goblin. Instead it meant something like “good goblin.” Since Arneson and Gygax took every fantasy idea that wasn’t nailed down, and many that were, Hobgoblin entered the fantasy universe as some sort of bigger goblin and thus it has remained since (of course, Kobold is the German word for Goblin – and the result is that now Kobold is some sort of separate non-Goblin type creature.
The world of fantasy gaming is weird that way.
September 1, 2010 at 6:06 pm #11705Chris has chosen the Variag Archer as the winner for this months Gold Fellowship.
September 1, 2010 at 6:27 pm #11706For the record, according to the Oxford English Dictionary a ‘Hobgoblin’ is a ‘mischievous, tricksy imp or sprite … a terifying apparition, a bogy’, and has been in use since at least 1530.
And I wonder why The Man opted for the Variag?
September 1, 2010 at 6:59 pm #11710If memory serves, he went with the OED dictionary definition at first.
And then unleashed his powers of linguist-fu and went, here, hang on.
And then promptly forgot about it, because he was busy. Which is pretty much the story of the various Histories of Middle-earth books.
September 1, 2010 at 8:15 pm #11711…. who knows why he decide to vote for Variag archer, but for me this is better solution than another one orc commander or not…….
September 1, 2010 at 10:28 pm #11714Well, maybe we can now have a miniature of this guy:
or this guy
or this guy
Gavin
September 1, 2010 at 10:55 pm #11715As I said: there won´t be two releases. But nobody is interested in this, right!
Well, as far as I am concerned I loved that the Variag archer is been chosen. I think everybody knows so far that I am a real fan of “Easterlings”.
Please don´t explain to me the difference between Easterlings and Variags!
I have suggested a mounted easterling archer- mongolian lookink like. Now we will have a Variag foot-archer.
I will wonder how “mongolian”-kind he will be. Maybe such “mongolian”-kind as the already existing Variag is.
I am really looking forward this miniature! Absolutely great!September 2, 2010 at 2:57 am #11718I won’t explain to you that a Variag is a type of Easterling, and how, in the MERP legendarium, they are related to the various other Easterling confederations such as the Sagath in various ways.
I’ll also fail to explain to you how they’ve been typically illustrated in MERP and related media as a sort of Mongolian looking lot, with furry hats. Thus the old mounted Variag was a Mongolian looking fellow with a furry hat.
I’ll further fail to point out that Variag is the Russian word for Viking and could therefore mean that the Variags of Khand are thus some sort of Northman tribe in the service of darkness.
Because I fail like that
September 2, 2010 at 6:28 am #11720All in all you can’t tell us very much at all, then, so I won’t ask. Oh, and today’s “by the way” is that personally I’ve always thought of the Variags as more Pecheneg/Kazak than Mongol-looking, but if pressed I won’t tell you that. Happily, as Master Thingol has already said, that’s the joy of allowing our imaginations the room to run free. Mind you, mine has run so far that I haven’t seen it for a while, but I’m sure it’ll come back when it gets hungry.
September 2, 2010 at 12:41 pm #11725Oh I didn’t know the Variags where imported from Russia….:lol:
September 2, 2010 at 12:53 pm #11727Hello Holger,
Check your PM.
September 2, 2010 at 2:34 pm #11731Huoooommmm … why discuss the choice The Man made … huom … concerning this matter, as for me, it is important to know that what he chose might cover his interest in sculpting a certain figure once he had the choice … rhuoommm … I do remember well his interest and enthusiasm that in the end lead to the UP as it is now … hom …
Besides, I just received the Hurín-figure … huoommm … I always thought “Ah, another Gondorian officer” … huom … now I have to witness that the figure is excellent … rhuoommm …
same with that carynx-blowing-Dunlending fellow … huomrhuooommmm …
As for the vote on the GF board again, some days ago I tried to point out what will happen as there are some rules about that voting … hoommm … why that Variag? you ask? … rhuom … I dare to guess that for The Man it might be more interesting to sculpt a “new” figure which means more of a challenge than just to vary one of hundreds of orc-poses existing and adding different details … rhuoommm … just my thoughts … homSeptember 2, 2010 at 2:45 pm #11733You are right indeed Master Ent!
And as I wrote on the GF board, the mounted Variag is waiting for a friend…September 2, 2010 at 3:07 pm #11735I thought he might be frustrated with Easterling types, what with the long-delayed Easterling M series, but perhaps he sees the GF figure as an opportunity to enable us to see at least something of the sttyle he has developed for them.
Clearly he must prefer the Variag to Mauhur, or he wouldn’t have chosen him. Still, I’d still have preferred to see an actual named character from the book rather than another generic jobbie.
September 2, 2010 at 3:08 pm #11736I added my suggestion in mount doom again. I wish it will get good support one day. a very nice diorama is missing in this place…
September 2, 2010 at 3:59 pm #11739Huooommmm … Master Barliman, that’s for sure … huom … I also would rather have welcomed some Variag army instead of having just one bowman who obviously lost his mount … rhuom …
we know that Tolkien’s imaginations and thoughts about “Easterlings” might cover a wide range of peoples and their different origins … rhuoom … but this was discussed around here several times … huoommm …
hoommm … I doubt that this coming MS-figure will reveil anything of that “forgotten” M-Easterling series … rhuoommm … just a guess, of course … hoooooommmm …Rhhuuuooommm … hom … as for the discussion (again) whether to have only named actual characters from the book as suggestions on that goldie-board, rather than have more of them what you called, ‘generic jobbies’ … huommmm … I cannot completely agree … huom … if that were a restriction to suggestions on the goldie-board, we would not have a Lossoth hunter or a camel-rider attacking a Gondorian … huoommm … etc. … hom … you know what I mean …
September 2, 2010 at 4:09 pm #11740Indeedy:
Variag is the same word as Varangian, hence Varangian guard. There’s a fascinating history of political identity politics going on in Russia as to whether the Russian people were “essentially” Swedes (AKA “Rus” AKA Vikings AKA Varangians) or Slavs. A great way to get into trouble during the communist era was to dig up a Viking town and say “hey, this looks like the Swedes made it”
As for the Pechenegs, I’d thought the good barman and I had decided they were a good parallel with the Wainriders :p
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘The Taproom’ is closed to new replies.
MMP › Mithril in Middle-Earth › The Prancing Pony › The Taproom